[Attachment Characteristics and Speciality Choice among Medical Students].

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nBased upon a study by Ciechanowski et al. [27], a parallel survey was performed at the medical school of the University of Jena with the goal to determine a relationship between specialty choice and attachment characteristics among medical students.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA sample of 411 medical students from different phases of the medical training (73,2% females, mean age: 22.7 yrs.) were asked about their current specialty choice and invited to describe themselves in three different attachment questionnaires. These were the Relationship Style Questionnaire (RSQ), the Bielefeld Partnership Expectation Questionnaire and the Relationship-specific Attachment Scales for adults in the versions related to the mother and the partner. In comparing subgroups, we first used Ciechanowski et al. s [27] differentiation of specialty contrasting primary and non-primary care specialties. In addition, a categorization of Buddeberg-Fischer et al. [29] differentiating a total of 7 subgroups was used (general medicine, internal medicine, surgery, anesthesiology/emergency medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry/neurology and obstetrics/gynecology).\n\n\nRESULTS\nComparing the groups according to Ciechanowski et al. s categorization, differences occurred that were not replicating the original study: Students of the first subgroup (primary care) appeared to be more insecurely attached (according to the RSQ) and showed higher scores in subscales indicating dependency and preoccupation (e.\u2009g. fear of separation, dependently related to mother and partner). Similar as in Ciechanowski s study, the second group (non-primary care) revealed more individuals categorized as avoidant (or self-reliant). To differentiate the picture, the 7 categories according to Buddeberg-Fischer et al. [27] were compared. This comparison indicated that future pediatricians were classified as more insecure and ambivalent, whereas anesthesiologists more commonly were avoidant and dismissing. This picture was confirmed using comparisons of the questionnaire subscales. Since gender differences occurred both, related to specialty choice as well as attachment, gender was considered as a covariate in the analyses.\n\n\nCONLUSIONS\nIn contrast to the study of Ciechanowski et al. [27], future pediatricians as part of the primary care group were characterized by a tendency to be dependent and preoccupied in all attachment measures, whereas the result of a tendency to be more avoidant and self-reliant among anesthesiologists and students choosing emergency medicine was more in line with the US-American study. Future research dealing with the motivation to choose specific fields of action in medicine should consider other psychological characteristics as well as biographical aspects.