Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Abstract

Background and study aims\u2002 Adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is still unsatisfactory in many countries, thereby limiting prevention of CRC. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), a minimally invasive procedure, could be an alternative to fecal immunochemical tests or optical colonoscopy for CRC screening, and might increase adherence in CRC screening. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of CCE compared to optical colonoscopy (OC) as the gold standard, adequacy of bowel preparation regimes and the patient perspective on diagnostic measures. Methods\u2002 We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register for Clinical Trials. Pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity and the diagnostic odds ratio with their respective 95\u200a% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for studies providing sufficient data. Results\u2002 Of 840 initially identified studies, 13 were included in the systematic review and up to 9 in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities and specificities for polyps\u200a≥\u200a6\u200amm were 87\u200a% (95\u200a% CI: 83\u200a%–90\u200a%) and 87\u200a% (95\u200a% CI: 76\u200a%–93\u200a%) in 8 studies, respectively. For polyps ≥\u200a10\u200amm, the pooled estimates for sensitivities and specificities were 87\u200a% (95\u200a% CI: 83\u200a%–90\u200a%) and 95\u200a% (95\u200a% CI: 92\u200a%–97\u200a%) in 9 studies, respectively. A patients’ perspective was assessed in 31\u200a% (n\u200a=\u200a4) of studies, and no preference of CCE over OC was reported. Bowel preparation was adequate in 61\u200a% to 92\u200a% of CCE exams. Conclusions\u2002 CCE provides high diagnostic accuracy in an adequately cleaned large bowel. Conclusive findings on patient perspectives require further studies to increase acceptance/adherence of CCE for CRC screening.