TEVAR Following FET: Current Outcomes of Rendezvous Procedures in Clinical Practice.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\n\u2003The treatment of extensive thoracic/thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies with arch involvement remains a challenging task in aortic surgery. The introduction of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique offered a link between open surgery and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Despite a decade of experience, data on the complementary use of these techniques are scant. The aim of this study was to evaluate TEVAR following FET in clinical reality.\n\n\nMETHODS\n\u2003Between November 2006 and June 2018, 20 patients (9 females; median age of 69 years) underwent endovascular second-stage completion after FET. The clinical outcomes, technical feasibility, and morphological findings were analyzed retrospectively.\n\n\nRESULTS\n\u2003Eleven of the 20 interventions were intended rendezvous procedures in a multistage approach; 4 were elective reinterventions, and 5 were emergency complication repairs. The median interval between FET and TEVAR was 231 days (11 days-7.4 years). The technical success rate was 100%. During a median follow-up (FU) period of 58.3 months, the overall survival rate was 95%, with one in-hospital death. Neurological complications occurred in three cases (spinal cord injury: n\u2009=\u20091; stroke: n\u2009=\u20092). Computed tomography angiography showed overall regression in the median diameter of the proximal descending aorta (from 57 to 48.5\u2009mm).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\n\u2003TEVAR as a second-stage intervention after FET is a feasible option, with satisfactory results at medium-term FU. In extensive thoracoabdominal aortic disease without proximal landing zones, the complementary use of both techniques in a multistage approach should be considered.