Opinion: The National Institutes of Health needs to better balance funding distributions among US institutions

Abstract

The NIH is the federal steward of biomedical research in the United States. Taxpayers fund the NIH; the NIH supports research into the underlying biology, etiology, and treatment of diseases; and benefits of that research are returned to taxpayers. This is a large and complex enterprise, but at its core are two fundamental principles. The NIH is obligated to distribute its research grants and grant dollars in a fair and impartial manner among qualified investigators nationwide and to maximize the return on taxpayers’ investments.\n\n\n\nThe NIH should rethink how it doles out funding. Studies indicate that research output does not grow linearly with the amount of research project grant support—and that the greatest rates of return are achieved with intermediate levels of funding. Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).\n\n\n\nBut to meet these obligations, the NIH must establish a better-balanced distribution of funding among institutions. Here, I describe why such changes are needed and propose a specific mechanism for how they could be implemented.\n\nThe director of the NIH, Francis Collins, has recognized that “the US biomedical research workforce does not currently mirror the nation’s population demographically” and that “recruiting and retaining a diverse set of minds and approaches is vital to harnessing the complete intellectual capital of the nation” (1). These systemic problems stem, in part, from unequal access to NIH grant support among investigators grouped by race (2), gender (3), age (4), institution (5), and state (6).\n\nThe differences in grant application success rates and award sizes among investigators grouped in various ways affect where the grant dollars go, leading to heavily skewed distributions of funding. For example, less than one in three applicants get any of their NIH research project grant applications funded over a five-year period (7), and among successful applicants, a small minority are strongly … \n\n[↵][1]1Email: WahlsWayneP{at}uams.edu.\n\n [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1