Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | 2021

The intricate relationship between transcription and translation

 
 

Abstract


Two conserved processes express the genetic information of all organisms. First, DNA is transcribed into a messenger RNA (mRNA) by the multisubunit enzyme RNA polymerase (RNAP). Second, the mRNA directs protein synthesis, when the ribosome translates its nucleotide sequence to amino acids using the genetic code. Because these two processes are so fundamental, a multitude of regulatory processes have evolved to regulate them. Most examples involve regulation of either transcription or translation. In PNAS, Chatterjee et al. (1) instead describe a complex and intricate regulatory process in which transcription and translation are concurrently regulated by each other. Transcription and translation are commonly viewed as separate. In eukaryotes, their respective confinement to the nucleus and cytoplasm enforces this. Yet, prokaryotes have no such barrier, and newly synthesized mRNAs are translated while they are still being transcribed. RNAP and the trailing ribosome are therefore in close spatial proximity, allowing each to influence the activity of the other. The possibility of a physical connection that could support functional coupling was proposed in 1964 by Marshall Nirenberg’s laboratory based on biochemical experiments (2). They highlighted the potential importance of regulatory processes that simultaneously affect both transcription and translation. Electron micrographs of ruptured Escherichia coli cells, commonly termed “Miller spreads,” confirmed the close proximity between RNAP and the trailing ribosome (3). The role and mechanism of coupling have received renewed interest over the past 10 y. Biochemical and structural approaches alongside new measurements of gene expression rates in vivo have clarified several important aspects. Early studies had demonstrated that translation can release RNAP from regulatory pauses (4). This mechanism, part of a process known as attenuation, had been described in the context of the leader sequences of specific operons. Yet more recent evidence points to additional genome-wide mechanisms of translation promoting transcription: the trailing ribosome pushing RNAP forward along the gene (5, 6). RNAP pauses regularly when it encounters specific DNA sequences and can slide backward. A forward translocating ribosome could thus minimize the formation and aid in the release of transcriptional pauses. This could explain the synchronization of transcription and translation rates observed in E. coli (5). It is also essential to fitness, as translation maintains genome stability by releasing arrested transcription complexes that would otherwise interfere with DNA replication (7). The molecular architecture that occurs during pause release likely resembles recent structures of ribosome– RNAP complexes determined with short intervening mRNAs (8–10). This supramolecular assembly has been termed the “expressome.” The expressome is dynamic and adopts a distinct arrangement when the transcription factor NusG is present (9, 10). By simultaneously binding the ribosome and RNAP, NusG acts as a physical bridge. This minimizes the formation of mRNA secondary structures that could inhibit transcription and translation and also sequesters a NusG domain that promotes transcription termination. Impairment of the NusG–ribosome interaction impacts coupling in vivo (11). RfaH, another member of the NusG family, also has the ability to bind both RNAP and the ribosome, but the consequences are less-well-understood (12). In PNAS, Chatterjee et al. (1) shed further light with an analysis of factors that drive the establishment of coupled translation at an early stage of transcription. Using biochemical and single-molecule fluorescence analyses, the interplay between ribosome recruitment and rates of transcription and translation are examined. Further, how each of these ismodulated by a regulatory riboswitch is tested. Previous work has focused on the regulation of RNAP by translation elongation, and here a link is demonstrated between RNAP and translation initiation: an interesting aspect of transcription–translation coupling.

Volume 118
Pages None
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2106284118
Language English
Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Full Text