Impact of exacerbations on St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score in patients with severe asthma: post hoc analyses of two clinical trials and an observational study

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To assess the effect of asthma exacerbations and mepolizumab treatment on health status of patients with severe asthma using the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Methods: Post hoc analyses were conducted using data from two randomized controlled trials in patients ≥12\u2009years old with severe eosinophilic asthma randomized to receive placebo or mepolizumab 75\u2009mg intravenously (32-week MENSA study) or 100\u2009mg subcutaneously (MENSA/24-week MUSCA studies), and an observational single-visit study in patients with severe asthma (IDEAL). Linear regression models assessed the impact of historical exacerbations on baseline SGRQ total and domain scores (using data from each of the three studies), and within-study severe exacerbations and mepolizumab treatment on end-of-study SGRQ scores (using data from MENSA/MUSCA). Results: Overall, 1755 patients were included (MENSA, N\u2009=\u2009540; MUSCA, N\u2009=\u2009551; IDEAL, N\u2009=\u2009664). In all studies, higher numbers of historical exacerbations were associated with worse baseline SGRQ total scores. Each additional historical exacerbation (beyond the second [MENSA/MUSCA]) or first [IDEAL] was associated with worsening mean total SGRQ scores of +1.5, +1.1 at baseline and +2.3 within the year prior to study enrollment. During MENSA and MUSCA, each within-study severe exacerbation was associated with a worsening in total SGRQ score of +2.4 and +3.4 points at study end. Independent of exacerbation reduction, mepolizumab accounted for an improvement in total SGRQ score of −5.3 points (MENSA) and −6.2 points (MUSCA). Conclusions: These findings support an association between a higher number of exacerbations and worse health status in patients with severe (eosinophilic) asthma.