R-CHOP compared to R-CHOP\u2009+\u2009X for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is standard of care first line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), though outcomes remain suboptimal. Methods We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP vs. R-CHOP\u2009+\u2009X (addition of another drug to R-CHOP) as first line treatment for DLBCL. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to September 2020. Results Our search yielded ten trials including 4206 patients. The added drug was bortezomib or lenalidomide in three trials each, and gemcitabine, bevacizumab and ibrutinib, each drug in one trial. R-CHOP\u2009+\u2009X was associated with statistically significant improved disease control (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78–0.99). The point estimate was in favor of improved overall survival with R-CHOP\u2009+\u2009X (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–1.00), although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed improved disease control with the addition of lenalidomide and in patients younger than 60\u2009years. R-CHOP\u2009+\u2009X was associated with an increase in serious adverse events and grade III/IV hematologic toxicity. Conclusion The addition of another drug to frontline R-CHOP treatment for DLBCL did not result in a significant improvement in OS, although we did observe improved disease control compared to R-CHOP, perhaps most evident with the addition of lenalidomide. Yet, RCHOP\u2009+\u2009X was associated with an increased risk for serious and hematological adverse events. Further studies could reveal subgroups that would benefit most from augmentation of standard R-CHOP.