Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs | 2021

Investigational treatment options in phase I and phase II trials for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatric patients

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


ABSTRACT Introduction: Upfront treatment of pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) results in cure rates of 60–95%, depending on risk factors. However, patients with refractory or relapsed B-ALL or T-ALL have much worse outcomes with conventional chemotherapy, hence treatment of these cohorts with novel agents is a priority. Areas Covered: This paper reviews early phase clinical trials in pediatric leukemia. Investigational antibody therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T), and other targeted therapies are examined. The authors discuss the mechanisms of action, side effects, trial designs, and outcomes and reflect on potential research directions. PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched from 2010 to present, using keywords ‘lymphoblastic leukemia’ with filters for pediatric age, Phase 1 clinical trial and Phase 2 clinical trial. Expert Opinion: Pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia often do not derive additional benefit from intensified conventional chemotherapy approaches which have arguably been maximized in the upfront setting. Therefore, novel approaches, such as immunotherapy and targeted agents should be prioritized. Progress will require commitment from pharmaceutical companies regarding these orphan diagnoses and acknowledgment from regulatory bodies that outcomes are suboptimal with conventional chemotherapy.

Volume 30
Pages 611 - 620
DOI 10.1080/13543784.2021.1916466
Language English
Journal Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

Full Text