Choice of scheduled cesarean delivery versus trial of labor for advanced maternal age primiparous women

Abstract

Abstract Objective: We aimed to evaluate perinatal outcomes of advanced maternal age (AMA) primiparous women seeking scheduled cesarean delivery (CD) versus a trial of labor (TOL). Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women ≥40 years of age carrying a single fetus, who delivered at a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center (2007–2014). We compared perinatal outcomes of women who chose a scheduled CD with those who chose TOL. Subsequently, we compared women who had successful TOL (sTOL) with those who had a failed TOL (fTOL). Results: Out of 62 102 deliveries during the study period, inclusion criteria were met by 374 women. Of them, 83 (22.2%) women had a scheduled CD, and 291 (77.8%) had TOL. Of the TOL group, 118 women (40.5%) had fTOL and 173 (59.5%) had sTOL. Women in the fTOL had higher rates of 1-min Apgar score <7, neonatal asphyxia and adverse neonatal composite outcome compared with women in the sTOL group (p\u2009<\u2009.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, compared with sTOL, fTOL was not associated with adverse neonatal composite outcome. Compared with scheduled CD, fTOL was associated with an increased risk for adverse neonatal composite outcome (aOR 2.65, 95% CI 1.13–6.19, p\u2009=\u2009.03). Conclusion: AMA primiparous women attempting TOL have comparable outcome to those seeking scheduled CD, however, women with fTOL have higher rates of adverse neonatal outcome.