The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine | 2021

Do patients with a single abnormal OGTT value need a globally admitted definition such as “borderline GDM”? Pregnancy outcomes of these women and the evaluation of new inflammatory markers

 
 
 

Abstract


Abstract Introduction One of the approaches to diagnose Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is to detect two or more elevated values in 3-h Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) after an abnormal 50\u2009gr Glucose Challenge Test (GCT). Patients with single elevated OGTT generally postulated as healthy; however, these patients could experience adverse perinatal and maternal issues more frequently. We aimed to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with single abnormal OGTT primarily by comparing these women with healthy controls and GDM patients. Secondarily; Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), Platelet Distribution Width (PDW), Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) which were defined as novel inflammatory markers recently, were evaluated among these women within the first trimester and before delivery values whether these markers could use as a predictive marker of GDM. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study was achieved in Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Training Hospital between January 2016 and April 2020. Patients who had GCT and OGTT at 24th–28th weeks of gestation were reviewed. Patients with GDM, women with single elevated OGTT value, and women with normal OCT values were recruited at the study as groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Maternal-neonatal outcomes and postpartum complications were reviewed from hospital registry system. Each complication were accumulated in a group entitled peripartum complication (a patient who had more than 1 complication for example preeclampsia and acute fetal distress was added in the peripartum complication group as one patient). The novel inflammatory markers were evaluated as NLR and PLR, and thrombocyte parameters as MPV and PDW were compared within the groups, and between the groups individually in the time period of first trimester and before delivery. Results A total of 10,579 patients were screened with OCT, of these a total of 1718 patients’ results were between 140\u2009mg/dl and 199\u2009mg/dl. The numbers of the women who diagnosed GDM and who had single elevated OGTT were 508 and 469 respectively. Numbers of the patients who gave birth in our hospital and whose data were reviewed adequately were 464 in groups 1, 406 in group 2, and 768 in group 3. Patients with single elevated OGTT had increased rates of peripartum complication, acute fetal distress (AFD), IUGR, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery rate, macrosomia, labor arrest, blood component transfusion, post-partum complication and stillbirth than healthy controls. Statistical analysis of comparison between group 2 and 3 has revealed that; patients with single elevated OGTT had more peripartum complication (p = .032; odds ratio [OR]\u2009=\u20091.2, 95% CI: 1.02–1.54), had more babies with macrosomia (p\u2009<\u2009.001; [OR]\u2009=\u20091.7, 95% CI: 1.2–2.4), had more postpartum complication (p = .040; [OR]\u2009=\u20093, 95% CI: 0.997–9.1), and had higher cesarean rates (p\u2009<\u2009.001; [OR]\u2009=\u20091.29, 95% CI: 1.1–1.4). Evaluating the first trimester CBC parameters between groups; only PLR differed statistically significant in GDM patients. These parameters before delivery were also analyzed PLR and NLR values did not differ between all groups, on the other hand; MPV values were higher and PDW values were lower in healthy controls comparing GDM and single elevated OGTT group. Conclusion Patients with single elevated OGTT had a higher risk of maternal and neonatal consequences than women with normal OCT, which was comparable levels to patients with GDM. These patients should not be underestimated and could be classified as an individual diagnose such as “Borderline GDM.” To intervene in these patients with dietary advice and lifestyle changes like exercise could decrease neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes

Volume 34
Pages 3782 - 3789
DOI 10.1080/14767058.2021.1946779
Language English
Journal The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Full Text