Peer Review Declaration

Abstract

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Double-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? a) CATE operates a double blind review process. Upon receipt of the submission, the suitability and plagiarism analysis of submission will be checked by Editorial Office first. The submitted submissions with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, out of conference topics, particularly high rate of similarity or lack of a significant message will be rejected directly at this stage. b) Only the submissions passed the initial checking made by CATE Editorial Office can be submitted to reviewers. The Editorial Office will then organize the peer-review process performed by at least 2 independent reviewers who are experts in the field and have published 5 or more research articles in recent 3-5 years. Each submission will be reviewed follow its relevance, originality, technical quality, significance of the submission; there will be four results within 2-3 weeks: Accept / Reject outright / Consider after Major/Minor Revisions. c) Authors have 2-3 weeks to resubmit an updated version of their submissions with the necessary changes for further evaluation, which should follow the comments and suggestions from our reviewers. Only those submissions passed the peer review and accepted by the reviewers and editors will be included in the conference proceeding finally. • Conference submission management system: Online Conference Email: [email protected] (Miss He) • Number of submissions received: 205 Submissions • Number of submissions sent for review: 153 Submissions • Number of submissions accepted: 65 Submissions Accepted • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 42.48% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3 Reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 Reviewers • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism check system: iThenticate • Contact person for queries: Miss He Email: [email protected]