Compliance with Telemonitoring in Heart Failure. Are Study Findings Representative of Reality?: A Narrative Literature Review.

Abstract

Introduction: Telemonitoring technologies enable medical teams to remotely manage outpatients with heart failure (HF) and reduce their risk of HF-related hospitalizations. However, noncompliance threatens the effectiveness of these approaches. This review aims to identify whether patients who are less likely or unable to comply with telemonitoring and their instructions for use are represented by interventional telemonitoring studies, and if their exclusion from studies is resulting in study findings not representative of clinical reality. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted to identify interventional telemonitoring studies reporting compliance rates for HF patients. A search of PubMed and Medline databases identified eligible studies published between January 2000 and June 2021. Results: Twenty-five (n\u2009=\u200925) eligible studies with an interventional study design were identified. Reported compliance with telemonitoring ranged between 37% and 98.5%; however, 72% of studies reported good or medium compliance. A majority (76%) of studies had exclusion/inclusion criteria favoring the enrollment of patients who may be more likely to comply with telemonitoring and their instructions for use. Forty percent of studies had a sample with a mean or median age of <65 years. Participants were more likely to be male (majority in 92% of studies) and white (majority in 78% of studies that reported ethnicity). Conclusion: Compliance rates reported by current studies are unlikely to be generalizable to the wider HF population, particularly patients who are less likely or unable to comply with telemonitoring. Studies are therefore likely overestimating compliance rates. Future innovation should focus on designing low compliance solutions that require minimal engagement from users and future studies should aim to recruit a more generalizable cohort of patients. To achieve a more standardized metric of compliance, studies should report compliance (however defined) achieved by the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of all patients enrolled.