European Journal of Echocardiography | 2021

Regional myocardial work as determinant of heart failure in left bundle branch block

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


\n \n \n Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): The Norwegian Health Association\n \n \n \n Left bundle branch block (LBBB) worsen prognosis in heart failure patients. LBBB may also cause heart failure in otherwise healthy individuals. The mechanical changes induced by LBBB are potential determinants of heart failure in these patients, but their relation to left ventricular (LV) systolic function is incompletely understood.\n \n \n \n This study investigates the contribution of regional contractile function to heart failure in patients with LBBB.\n \n \n \n In 76 patients with LBBB and 11 healthy controls, myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography and myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis. Patients with ischemic heart disease or myocardial scarring were excluded. LBBB patients were stratified by LV ejection fraction (EF) >50% (EFpreserved), 36-50% (EFmid), and ≤35% (EFlow). 62 LBBB patients subsequently underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation and was re-examined at 6 months.\n \n \n \n Septal work was significantly and successively reduced from controls, EFpreserved, EFmid, to EFlow (1977\u2009±\u2009506, 1025\u2009±\u2009342, 601\u2009±\u2009494 and -41\u2009±\u2009303 mmHg·%, respectively, all p\u2009<\u20090.01) (Figure 1). There was a strong correlation (R\u2009=\u20090.84, p\u2009<\u20090.01) between septal work and LVEF. In contrast, work in the LV lateral wall was preserved in both EFpreserved (2367\u2009±\u2009459 mmHg·%) and EFmid (2252\u2009±\u2009449 mmHg·%) vs controls (2062\u2009±\u2009459 mmHg·%, all NS). In the EFlow group, however, LV lateral wall work was reduced (1473\u2009±\u2009568 mmHg·%, p\u2009<\u20090.01 vs controls). Thus, lateral wall function was not correlated with LVEF in patients with LVEF >35% (NS). At six month CRT septal work was markedly increased (165\u2009±\u2009485 vs 1288\u2009±\u2009523 mmHg·%, p\u2009<\u20090.01) and LV lateral wall work reduced (1730\u2009±\u2009620 vs 1264\u2009±\u2009490 mmHg·%, p\u2009<\u20090.01). LVEF increased from 32\u2009±\u20098 to 47\u2009±\u200910 % (p\u2009<\u20090.01).\n \n \n \n Heart failure in LBBB patients is determined by degree of septal dysfunction. LV lateral wall function, on the other hand, is preserved in the early phase of heart failure and was only reduced in patients with severe heart failure. Further clinical studies should investigate if measuring LV lateral wall function can increase precision in patient selection for CRT.\n Abstract Figure.\n

Volume 22
Pages None
DOI 10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.031
Language English
Journal European Journal of Echocardiography

Full Text