An intervention to increase physical activity in care home residents: results of a cluster-randomised, controlled feasibility trial (the REACH trial).

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nCare home (CH) residents are mainly inactive, leading to increased dependency and low mood. Strategies to improve activity are required.\n\n\nDESIGN AND SETTING\nCluster randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded process and health economic evaluations. Twelve residential CHs in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, were randomised to the MoveMore intervention plus usual care (UC) (n\u2009=\u20095) or UC only (n\u2009=\u20097).\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nPermanent residents aged ≥65\xa0years.\n\n\nINTERVENTION\nMoveMore: a whole home intervention involving all CH staff designed to encourage and support increase in movement of residents.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES AND MEASUREMENTS\nFeasibility objectives relating to recruitment, intervention delivery, data collection and follow-up and safety concerns informed the feasibility of progression to a definitive trial. Data collection at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months included: participants physical function and mobility, perceived health, mood, quality of life, cognitive impairment questionnaires; accelerometry; safety data; intervention implementation.\n\n\nRESULTS\n300 residents were screened; 153 were registered (62 MoveMore; 91 UC). Average cluster size: MoveMore: 12.4 CHs; UC: 13.0 CHs. There were no CH/resident withdrawals. Forty (26.1%) participants were unavailable for follow-up: 28 died (12 MoveMore; 16 UC); 12 moved from the CH. Staff informant/proxy data collection for participants was >80%; data collection from participants was <75%; at 9 months, 65.6% of residents provided valid accelerometer data; two CHs fully, two partially and one failed to implement the intervention. There were no safety concerns.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nRecruiting CHs and residents was feasible. Intervention implementation and data collection methods need refinement before a definitive trial. There were no safety concerns.