European journal of orthodontics | 2019

Geometric morphometric analysis of the palatal morphology in growing subjects with skeletal open bite.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


OBJECTIVES\nTo assess the morphological shape variations of the palatal vault in Open Bite (OB) growing subjects when compared with a Control Group (CG) by means of Geometric Morphometric Method (GMM).\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe OB Group (OBG) consisted of 75 subjects (39 females, 36 males; mean age: 8.5 ± 0.8 years) who were collected retrospectively with the following inclusion criteria: European ancestry, overbite less than 0 mm, mixed dentition stage, prepubertal skeletal maturation (CS1-CS2), hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (SN^GoGn > 37°). The OBG was compared with a CG of 46 prepubertal subjects presenting normal occlusion (24 females, 22 males; mean age of 8.3 ± 1.7 years). For each subject, lateral cephalograms and maxillary dental casts were available. Landmarks and semilandmarks were digitized on digital dental casts and GMM was applied. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed. OBG was divided in two subgroups: Sucking Habits Group (SHG) (39 subjects) and Non-Sucking Habits Group (NSHG) (36 subjects).\n\n\nRESULTS\nPC1 showed significant morphological changes in transverse and vertical dimensions with OBG palates higher and narrower when compared with CG. When comparing the two subgroups no statistically significant differences were found. NSHG demonstrated a slight reduction of the transverse dimension and a deeper palatal vault respect to SHG.\n\n\nLIMITATIONS\nThe limitations of this study were the division of OBG in two subgroups based on referral of thumb sucking habits without assessing the duration and the intensity of thumb sucking.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOB subjects presented with a significant constriction of the maxillary arch when compared with CG. The morphological palatal shape variations in OBG were not influenced by the presence or absence of non-nutritive sucking habits.

Volume 41 3
Pages \n 258-263\n
DOI 10.1093/ejo/cjy055
Language English
Journal European journal of orthodontics

Full Text