European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing | 2021

Discharging patients; does it need to be done by a doctor?

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


\n \n \n None\n \n \n \n Patients undergoing angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were historically reviewed post procedure by a member of the medical team who assesses the patient’s suitability for discharge and completes the discharge letter. Over the past 10 years, the number of patients admitted for these procedures as day cases has increased significantly. In addition, there has been an expansion in nursing roles in the UK with the development of a variety of clinical nurse specialist (CNS) posts which have taken over many of the traditional medical roles.\n The majority of patients undergoing elective angiography and PCI are admitted to a day case unit at this tertiary cardiac centre. There is no designated medical cover for the unit and medical staff from the acute cardiac unit are called to review patients and complete their discharge paperwork in addition to their other duties. This frequently results in delayed discharge and patients going home without a discharge summary.\n It was therefore proposed that suitably qualified CNSs could be trained to discharge these patients and others undergoing day case cardiology procedures.\xa0 From June 2017, the CNS team took over the role of reviewing patients post procedure and completing the discharge letter.\n \n \n \n The aim of the study was to evaluate if CNSs were able to discharge patients and provide a timely and effective service following elective cardiology procedures and to obtain patient feedback.\n \n \n \n Data on the number of patients reviewed by the CNSs from June 2017 to the end of December 2019, were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. A pilot study of patient experience was carried out in January 2020. Patients were given a questionnaire which asked about the explanation they received from the CNS regarding the procedure they had undergone, if their medication was reviewed and discussed with them, and if they received a discharge summary to take home.\n \n \n \n 1287 patients were reviewed by the CNS team during the above period. 811 (63.0%) patients had undergone angiography and 423 (32.9%) PCI. \xa0Informal feedback from the staff working on the day case unit included that patients were discharged earlier, had improved knowledge about their procedure and that the discharge letter was more detailed when completed by the CNS team.\n Eight patients completed the pilot questionnaire. Six were discharged by one of the CNS team, one by a doctor and one patient was not sure who did their discharge. All patients were very satisfied with the process and the information they were given.\n \n \n \n Experienced CNSs can deliver high-quality, timely discharge of patients following cardiology procedures. \xa0This process is being used as a template to expand nurse-led discharge to other areas in cardiology. Patient experience will continue to be audited with a larger sample size in 2020.\n

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab060.123
Language English
Journal European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Full Text