The establishment of a mouse model of deep endometriosis

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION\nIs it possible to establish a mouse model of deep endometriosis (DE)?\n\n\nSUMMARY ANSWER\nA mouse DE model that is macroscopically and microscopically similar to nodular lesions in humans can be constructed in as short as 3 weeks by intraperitoneal injection of uterine fragments along with the infusion of substance P (SP) and/or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP).\n\n\nWHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY\nAlthough a baboon DE model was reported 5 years ago, its prohibitive cost and demand for facilities and expertise associated with the use of non-human primates put its use out of reach for most laboratories.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION\nA total of 48 female Balb/C mice were used for this study. Among them, 16 were randomly selected as donors that contributed uterine fragments, and the remaining 32 were recipient mice. The mice with induced endometriosis were followed up for 3-4 weeks.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS\nOne day before the induction of endometriosis by intraperitoneal injection of uterine fragments, osmotic pumps were inserted into equal groups of recipient mice to infuse either sterile saline, SP, CGRP, or both SP and CGRP. The hotplate test was administrated to all mice at the baseline and before and after induction of endometriosis. Four (3 for the SP+CGRP group) weeks after induction, all mice were sacrificed. Their endometriotic lesions were excised, weighed and processed for histopathologic examination, and histochemistry, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analyses of markers of proliferation, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation (FMT), smooth muscle metaplasia (SMM), mesothelial-mesenchymal transition (MMT) and endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) were done. The extent of lesional fibrosis was evaluated by Masson trichrome staining. To further evaluate surrounding organ/tissue invasion, the peritoneal areas adhesive to the lesions were excised for immunohistochemical analysis.\n\n\nMAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE\nEndometriotic lesions in mice treated with SP and/or CGRP satisfied all requirements for DE, i.e. presence of endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, abundance of fibromuscular content, and encapsulation in surrounding tissues or organs. The lesion weight in the CGRP, SP and SP+CGRP groups was 1.62, 2.14 and 2.18-fold, respectively, heavier than that of control group. Concomitantly, the SP, CGRP and SP+CGRP groups had significantly shorter hotplate latency than that of control group. Lesions in mice treated with SP and/or CGRP, especially with SP+CGRP, exhibited characteristics consistent with EMT, FMT, SMM and extensive fibrosis, along with signs of MMT and EndoMT. Lesional invasion into surrounding tissues/organs was found to be 25.0, 75.0 and 87.5% in mice treated with CGRP, SP and SP+CGRP, but none in control mice.\n\n\nLARGE SCALE DATA\nN/A.\n\n\nLIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION\nThis study is limited by the use of histologic and immunohistochemistry analyses only and lacks molecular data.\n\n\nWIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS\nThe establishment of a mouse DE model supports the idea that endometriotic lesions are wounds undergoing repeated tissue injury and repair and underscores the importance of microenvironments in shaping the lesions destiny. In addition, signs consistent with MMT and EndoMT indicate that there may be more culpable factors that still remain unidentified and should be pursued in the future. Moreover, the close correlation between the extent of lesional fibrosis and markers of EMT, MMT, EndoMT, FMT and SMM as shown here should facilitate our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the DE pathophysiology. Since this DE model is based on a biologically plausible and evidence-backed theory, it should shed much needed insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of DE.\n\n\nSTUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)\nThis research was supported by Grants 81471434 (S.W.G.), 81530040 (S.W.G.), 81771553 (S.W.G.), 81671436 (X.S.L.) and 81871144 (X.S.L.) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.