Association between the number of oocytes retrieved and neonatal outcomes after freeze-all IVF cycles.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION\nIs there any association between the number of oocytes retrieved and neonatal outcomes following IVF/ICSI treatment for patients using a freeze-all strategy?\n\n\nSUMMARY ANSWER\nThere was no increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in cycles with high number of oocytes retrieved (≥ 16) compared to those with 10-15 oocytes retrieved in freeze-all cycles.\n\n\nWHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY\nRecent studies have found that there is an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB, <37\xa0weeks gestation) and low birth weight (LBW, <2500\xa0g) following IVF in women with a high number (>20) of oocytes retrieved in fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Other studies have found that there is an association between the number of oocytes retrieved and placenta praevia. However, the association between the number of oocytes retrieved and neonatal outcomes when using a freeze-all strategy is unknown.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION\nThis retrospective cohort study included 14\u2009170 women with singleton deliveries achieved by a freeze-all strategy performed between November 2006 and December 2017 in China. Only the first delivery from one episode of ovarian stimulation was included.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS\nOnly cycles using a freeze-all strategy performed during the study period and resulting in singleton live births were included. Patients were categorized into five groups according to the number of oocytes retrieved: 1-3, 4-9, 10-15, 16-20 or >20 oocytes. In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between ovarian response and the outcomes of PTB, early PTB, LBW and other neonatal outcomes, the 10 to 15 oocyte category was used as a reference and other four groups were analysed as dummy variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate possible associations of birth weight z-scores and the number of oocytes retrieved (analysed as a continuous variable) with other confounding factors.\n\n\nMAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE\nAfter adjusted for confounding factors, no significant differences were observed in the risk of PTB (P\xa0=\u20090.837), LBW (P\xa0=\u20090.974), early PTB (P\xa0=\u20090.341), very LBW (P\xa0=\u20090.848), congenital malformation (P\xa0=\u20090.916) and other adverse neonatal outcome among patients with different number of oocytes retrieved. There was a higher risk of early PTB among women with a poor ovarian response (1-3 oocytes) compared with women with a normal response (10-15 oocytes) (1.5% vs 0.8%), crude odds ratio (OR): 2.001, 95% CI: 1.159-3.465, P\xa0=\u20090.013. However, the difference was not significant after adjusting for confounders, adjusted OR: 1.753, 95% CI: 0.997-3.081, P\xa0=\u20090.051.\n\n\nLIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION\nData on some known confounders such as smoking and medical history of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia were lacking. As with any retrospective study, unknown confounders may affect outcomes.\n\n\nWIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS\nIn the freeze-all cycles, there was no association between number of oocytes retrieved and adverse neonatal outcomes. This is a reassuring finding for both clinicians and patients who are planning to use freeze-all cycles for a variety of indications.\n\n\nSTUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)\nGrants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31770989 to Y.W.) and the Shanghai Ninth People s Hospital Foundation of China (JYLJ030 to Y.W.). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.