Human reproduction | 2019

Women from diverse minority ethnic or religious backgrounds desire more infertility education and more culturally and personally sensitive fertility care.

 
 
 
 

Abstract


STUDY QUESTION\nWhat are the views, experiences and healthcare needs of infertile women from a minority ethnic or religious background living in Wales?\n\n\nSUMMARY ANSWER\nWomen from ethnic and religious minority backgrounds consider that their communities have highly pronatalistic attitudes and stigmatize infertility, and express the need for more infertility education (for themselves and their communities), as well as more socio-culturally and interpersonally sensitive fertility care.\n\n\nWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN\nSome people from minority ethnic or religious groups perceive pressure to conceive from their communities, experience social costs when they are unable to have children and stressful interactions with the fertility healthcare system while attempting to conceive.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION\nThis study was based on a one-day drawing workshop to collect visual (artwork produced by participants) and textual (all conversations and discussions during the workshop) data about the participants views and experiences of infertility and their fertility care needs.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS\nParticipants were nine adult women with a minority ethnic or religious status living in Wales, UK, who were experiencing or had experienced infertility in the past. The workshop comprised five activities: (i) small and large group discussion of infertility-related drawings, (ii) lide-based lecture consisting of an introduction to the basics of drawing objects and people and (iii) thoughts and feelings, (iv) free drawing session and (v) group sharing. Audio recordings of the workshop were transcribed verbatim. Textual data was analysed with thematic analysis. Risk for bias was addressed via individual coding by two authors followed by joint presentation and discussion of results with the research team and participants.\n\n\nMAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE\nForty-one themes were identified and grouped into eight distinct higher order themes. These themes described the emotional, relational and social burden of infertility experienced by women, which they perceived to result from their communities highly pronatalistic attitudes and stigmatization of infertility. Themes also captured women s adaptive coping strategies and critical attitude towards pronatalist ideologies. Lastly, themes captured their overall positive evaluation of their fertility health care, their desire for more infertility education (for themselves and their communities) and for culturally competent and interpersonally sensitive care.\n\n\nLIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION\nOur participants were a small, non-random sample recruited in collaboration with a local charity, which may mean that all participants were well integrated in their communities. Analysis focused on capturing commonalities in participants experiences and this may sometimes result in homogenising diverse experiences.\n\n\nWIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS\nMore education about the infertility experiences of minority ethnic and religious groups at the community and healthcare delivery level may translate into lessened negative attitudes towards infertility and more culturally competent care, which can be beneficial for women.\n\n\nSTUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)\nThis research was funded by Welsh Crucible. The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1093/humrep/dez156
Language English
Journal Human reproduction

Full Text