Patient preference study comparing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nTo compare patient preferences and acute adverse events of hypofractionated (HF) and conventionally fractionated (CF) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery in our institution.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a patient preference study comparing CF-WBI (50 Gy/25 fractions) and HF-WBI (41.6 Gy/16 fractions) after breast-conserving surgery. Eligible patients selected either type of fractionation following an explanation from the radiation oncologist. In this report, we analyzed the selection rate and acute toxicities.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBetween June 2009 and December 2013, 348 patients (349 breasts) were identified as eligible for the study. Among them, 259 patients (260 breasts [74.5%]) selected CF-WBI and 89 patients (89 breasts [25.5%]) selected HF-WBI. Factors significantly associated with the selection of HF-WBI were older age (P = 0.028) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041). Regarding acute adverse events, Grade 2 (G2) or higher radiation dermatitis was less frequently observed in HF-WBI than in CF-WBI (13.8% vs. 29.4%; P = 0.004). In addition, G2 or higher breast pain was only observed in the CF-WBI group (6.9%; P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the presence of fatigue, wound pain or radiation pneumonitis of G2 or higher between the groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn this study, in which patients themselves selected the irradiation method, more patients tended to select CF-WBI. The frequency of G2 or higher dermatitis and breast pain was significantly lower in the HF-WBI group than in the CF-WBI group. Our results support the evidence for recommending HF-WBI after breast-conserving surgery while presenting aspects of patient preferences.