OpenNotes: Anticipatory Guidance and Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Psychologists in Interprofessional Settings.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nThe 21st Century Cures Act included an OpenNotes mandate to foster transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians by offering rapid electronic access to clinical notes. This article seeks to address concerns about increased documentation burden, vulnerability to patient complaints, and other unforeseen consequences of patients having near-real-time access to their records.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis topical review explores both extant literature, and case examples from the authors direct experience, about potential responses/reactions to OpenNotes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe ethics of disclosing medical information calls for nuanced approaches: Although too little access can undermine a patient s autonomy and the capacity for truly egalitarian shared decision-making, unfettered access to all medical information has significant potential to harm them. Suggested strategies for mitigating risks in premature disclosure include patient and provider education and modularizing sensitive information in notes.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe OpenNotes era has ushered in the possibilities of greater patient and family collaboration in shared decision-making and reduced barriers to documentation sharing. However, it has raised new ethical and clinician documentation considerations. In addition to clinician education, patients and families could benefit from education around the purpose of clinical documentation, how to utilize OpenNotes, and the benefits of engaging in dialogue regarding the content and tone of documentation.