Neuro-Oncology | 2019

Dynamic 18F-FET PET is a powerful imaging biomarker in gadolinium-negative gliomas

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


BACKGROUND\nWe aimed to elucidate the place of dynamic O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET in prognostic models of gadolinium (Gd)-negative gliomas.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn 98 patients with Gd-negative gliomas undergoing 18F-FET PET guided biopsy, time activity curves (TACs) of each tumor were qualitatively categorized as either increasing or decreasing. Additionally, post-hoc quantitative analyses were done using minimal time-to-peak (TTPmin) measurements. Prognostic factors were obtained from multivariate hazards models. The fit of the biospecimen- and imaging-derived models was compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA homogeneous increasing, mixed, and homogeneous decreasing TAC pattern was seen in 51, 19, and 28 tumors, respectively. Mixed TAC tumors exhibited both increasing and decreasing TACs. Corresponding adjusted 5-year survival was 85%, 47%, and 19%, respectively (P < 0.001). Qualitative and quantitative TAC measurements were highly intercorrelated (P < 0.0001). TTPmin was longest (shortest) in the homogeneous increasing (decreasing) TAC group and in between in the mixed TAC group. TTPmin was longer in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant tumors (P < 0.001). Outcome was similarly precisely predicted by biospecimen- and imaging-derived models. In the biospecimen model, World Health Organization (WHO) grade (P < 0.0001) and IDH status (P < 0.001) were predictors for survival. Outcome of homogeneous increasing (homogeneous decreasing) TAC tumors was nearly identical, with both TTPmin > 25 min (TTPmin ≤ 12.5 min) tumors and IDH-mutant grade II (IDH-wildtype) gliomas. Outcome of mixed TAC tumors matched that of both intermediate TTPmin (>12.5 min and ≤25 min) and IDH-mutant, grade III gliomas. Each of the 3 prognostic clusters differed significantly from the other ones of the respective models (P < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nTAC measurements constitute a powerful biomarker independent from tumor grade and IDH status.

Volume 21
Pages 274–284
DOI 10.1093/neuonc/noy098
Language English
Journal Neuro-Oncology

Full Text