Nutrition reviews | 2021

Effects of different sources of dietary protein on markers of kidney function in individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


CONTEXT\nThe type of dietary protein may modulate markers of diabetic kidney disease; however, no attempt to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has been performed to date.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo assess the effects of different types of dietary protein on urinary albumin excretion and glomerular filtration rate in individuals with diabetes.\n\n\nDATA SOURCES\nMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched for all published RCTs, with no language restriction, up to July 2020.\n\n\nDATA EXTRACTION\nStudy selection and data extraction were performed independently by 3 authors. Risk of bias was assessed independently by 2 authors, and the GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of the evidence.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwelve RCTs were included, of which 11 (involving 228 participants) were compiled in meta-analyses of random-effects models. Interventions consisted of diets emphasizing plant or white meat protein, with reduced intake of animal or red meat protein. Pooled data from crossover trials (n = 8) favored intervention diets for urinary albumin excretion (ratio of means, 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.94; I2 = 4%) and glomerular filtration rate (ratio of means, 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 0.94; I2 = 45%), compared with control diets. Results from parallel-design studies (n = 3), however, were not statistically significant for any outcome. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate, and most studies were judged with at least some concerns in terms of risk of bias.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis meta-analysis found weak evidence for small to moderate improvements in markers of kidney function in favor of interventions with lower animal protein (or red meat protein) compared with usual diets in short-term crossover trials. These findings require confirmation in well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nuab042
Language English
Journal Nutrition reviews

Full Text