Alternating Current Is More Fatigable Than Pulsed Current in People Who Are Healthy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nTolerance level and rapid fatigue onset are limitations in the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as an electrotherapeutic resource in rehabilitation and training protocols; however, it is unclear if pulsed current (PC) and alternating current (AC) produce different a fatigue level when applied at submaximal contraction level. The purpose of this study was to compare fatigue and discomfort levels between PC and AC during a submaximal contraction protocol in people who are healthy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this double-blind, randomized crossover trial conducted in a laboratory setting, there were 30 participants (male; 23.23\xa0years of age (SD\xa0=\xa04.59). Participants performed 2 submaximal fatigue protocols (with a 7-day interval) in a randomized order: PC (pulse duration\xa0=\xa02 milliseconds, pulse frequency\xa0=\xa0100\xa0Hz) and AC (2.5\xa0kHz, pulse duration\xa0=\xa00.4 milliseconds, burst frequency\xa0=\xa0100\xa0Hz). NMES currents were applied to the knee extensor motor point of the dominant limb. The NMES protocol consisted of 80 evoked contractions (time on:off\xa0=\xa05:10\xa0seconds) and lasted 20\xa0minutes. The current was maintained at a constant intensity throughout the NMES protocol. The primary outcome measures evaluated were: maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), fatigue index (evoked torque decline), fatigability (number of contractions for a 50% drop in evoked-torque from the protocol start), total evoked torque-time integral (TTI), decline in TTI, and discomfort level.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAC at 2.5\xa0kHz demonstrated higher MVIC decline post-fatigue, higher fatigue index, higher fatigability (ie, fewer contractions to reach the 50% evoked torque decline from the protocol start), smaller total TTI, and higher TTI decline when compared with PC. No between-currents difference was observed in mean discomfort.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPC is less fatigable than AC at 2.5\xa0kHz.\n\n\nIMPACT\nBased on this study, PC is the preferred current choice when the NMES goal is to generate higher muscle work, higher mechanical load, and smaller fatigability during training both for athletes who are healthy and for rehabilitation programs for people with disease or injury.