Paretic and nonparetic step tests are noninterchangeable in stroke: a prospective cohort study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nThe step test (ST) is a common clinical assessment of dynamic balance among survivors of stroke. The ST assesses a person s ability to place their paretic (paretic ST) or nonparetic (nonparetic ST) foot rapidly and repeatedly on and off a standardized block while standing. No study has formally explored if the 2 tests are interchangeable. Our study aimed to (1) differentiate the correlates of paretic and nonparetic ST and (2) compare their associations with physical function and falls.\n\n\nMETHODS\nEighty-one survivors of stroke were consecutively recruited from inpatient rehabilitation units (n\xa0=\xa04) and were assessed within 1\xa0week prior to discharge. In addition to the ST, a handheld dynamometer and computerized posturography were used to measure lower limb muscle strength and standing balance, respectively. Self-selected gait speed and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test were also assessed as measures of physical function. Falls data were monitored for 12\xa0months postdischarge using monthly calendars. Multivariable regression analyses were used to differentiate (1) the correlates of paretic and nonparetic STs and (2) their associations with physical function and falls.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe median score for the paretic and nonparetic ST were 8 and 9 steps, respectively. Paretic ankle plantar-flexor and dorsiflexor strength were the strongest correlates of nonparetic ST, whereas both paretic ankle and knee extensor strength were the strongest correlates of paretic ST. In multivariable analyses adjusting for each other, both STs were independently associated with gait speed and TUG scores. Paretic ST (odds ratio [OR]\xa0=\xa00.37; 95% CI\xa0=\xa00.22 to 0.62) was a stronger predictor than nonparetic ST (OR\xa0=\xa00.51; 95% CI\xa0=\xa00.34 to 0.78) in predicting future falls.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study confirmed that the paretic and nonparetic STs are noninterchangeable. ST scores should be assessed separately to achieve a more complete interpretation.\n\n\nIMPACT\nThis study is the first to objectively evaluate the similarities and differences between the paretic and nonparetic STs. This information may refine the use and interpretation of the 2 STs in the stroke population.