Factors Considered in Ranking Spine Surgery Fellowship Applicants: A Survey of Program Directors.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN\nCross-sectional study.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo determine which factors spine surgery fellowship program directors (PDs) consider most important when ranking applicants.\n\n\nSUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA\nSpine surgery is a popular orthopaedic subspecialty. As such, the spine fellowship match process is highly competitive. Surveys of fellowship PDs in orthopaedic sports medicine and hand surgery have demonstrated differing opinions regarding factors considered most important when ranking fellowship applicants. The factors considered important to spine surgery fellowship PDs have not been evaluated.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA web-based questionnaire was sent to the PDs of all spine surgery fellowships participating in the San Francisco (SF) Match Program. The questions were designed to identify criteria considered most important in ranking spine surgery fellowship applicants. A list of 12 criteria was presented and PDs were asked to rank these in order of importance. A weighted score for each criterion was calculated using the following scale: 5 points for each criterion ranked 1st, 4 points for 2nd, 3 points for 3rd, 2 points for 4th, and 1 point for 5th.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 73 PDs queried, 52 responded (71% response rate). The interview was the most important factor when ranking fellowship applicants. The other criteria deemed most important in order of weighted scoring were letters of recommendation and personal connections to the applicant and/or familiarity with the applicant s letter writer(s).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSpine surgery fellowship PDs consider the interview, letters of recommendation, and personal connections with the applicant/letter writers to be the most important factors when ranking candidates. These results may be valuable to orthopaedic residents and mentors of those pursuing fellowship training in spine surgery.Level of Evidence: 4.