Critical care medicine | 2021

Clinical Benefit of Extubation in Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


OBJECTIVES\nAlthough patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock are usually supported with mechanical ventilation, it is not clear whether sedation cessation and extubation might improve outcomes.\n\n\nDESIGN\nRetrospective cohort study with propensity score overlap weighting analysis.\n\n\nSETTING\nThree ICUs in a 1,500-bed tertiary university hospital.\n\n\nPATIENTS\nFrom an overall cohort of 641 patients with venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, the primary analysis was performed in 344 patients who had been successfully decannulated in order to reduce immortal time bias.\n\n\nMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS\nSeventy-five patients (22%) were extubated during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and were subsequently decannulated alive. Forty-nine percent received noninvasive ventilation, and 25% had emergency reintubation for respiratory, neurologic, or hemodynamic reasons. Higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II at admission (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI [0.95-0.99]; p = 0.008) was associated with a lower probability of extubation, whereas cannulation in cardiac surgery ICU (odds ratio, 3.14; 95% CI [1.21-8.14]; p = 0.018) was associated with an increased probability. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after propensity score overlap weighting. The number of ICU-free days within 30 days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation was significantly higher among extubated patients compared with nonextubated patients (22 d [11-26 d] vs 18 d [7-25 d], respectively; p = 0.036). There were no differences in other outcomes including ventilator-associated pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI [0.51-1.82]; p = 0.90) and all-cause mortality within 30 days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation (5% vs 17%; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI [0.19-1.59]; p = 0.27).As a secondary analysis, outcomes were compared in the overall cohort of 641 venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients. Results were consistent with the primary analysis as extubated patients had a higher number of ICU-free days (18 d [0-24 d] vs 0 d [0-18 d], respectively; < 0.001) and a lower risk of death within 30 days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI [0.29-0.71]; p = 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nExtubation during venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support is safe, feasible, and associated with greater ICU-free days.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005304
Language English
Journal Critical care medicine

Full Text