Journal of Hypertension | 2021

Renal outcomes and blood pressure patterns in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals at high cardiovascular risk

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Background: Diabetes and hypertension are risk factors for renal and cardiovascular outcomes. Data on the association of achieved blood pressure (BP) with renal outcomes in patients with and without diabetes are sparse. We investigated the association of achieved SBP, DBP with renal outcomes and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in people with vascular disease. Methods: In this pooled analysis, we assessed renal outcome data from high-risk patients aged 55 years or older with a history of cardiovascular disease, 70% of whom had hypertension, randomized to The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial and to Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease trials investigating telmisartan, ramipril and their combination with a median follow-up of 56 months. Standardized office BP was measured every 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and UAE at baseline, 2 years and study end. Associations of mean achieved BP on treatment were investigated on major renal outcomes including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), decline of eGFR by at least 40%, doubling of creatinine and the composites thereof and on UAE. Analyses were by Cox regression analysis, analysis of variance and Chi2-test. Of 30\u200a937 patients with complete data, 19\u200a450 patients without and 11\u200a487 with diabetes were enrolled between 1 December 2001 and 31 July 2003 and followed until 31 July 2008. Data were pooled as the outcomes for telmisartan 80\u200amg/day (n\u200a=\u200a2903) or placebo (n\u200a=\u200a2907) for Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease and ramipril 10\u200amg/day (n\u200a=\u200a8407), telmisartan 80\u200amg/day (n\u200a=\u200a8386) or the combination of both (n\u200a=\u200a8334) were similar. Results: For both those with and without diabetes, the hazard ratios for the composites ESRD or doubling of serum creatinine (707 events overall) and ESRD or 40% eGFR loss (2371 events overall) reached a nadir at achieved SBP of 120 to less than 140\u200ammHg, and increased with higher and lower SBP with similar relative risk with or without diabetes. For example, risk for the former composite reached a hazard ratios 3.06 (confidence interval 1.90–4.92) with a mean achieved SBP more than 160\u200ammHg compared with 120 to less than 130\u200ammHg with diabetes and hazard ratios 2.14 (1.09–4.26) without diabetes. In contrast, the development of new microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (3002 and 846 events overall) associated linearly over the whole range of achieved SBP (apart from a slight increase in risk at SBP less than 120\u200ammHg only in those without diabetes). Absolute risks for the composite and albuminuria outcomes were consistently greater in those with diabetes as compared with without diabetes with high event rates over the whole SBP spectrum. The increased renal risk at low SBP was not related to a meaningful reduction of mandated study drugs or open label renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibition. Conclusion: In patients at high cardiovascular risk, SBP levels more than 140\u200ammHg and less than 120 are associated with increased risk for renal outcomes. Renal risk was greater in diabetes across the whole range of achieved SBP and DBP. These data suggest similar target BP range in patients with and without diabetes to prevent renal outcomes, a frequent complication in high-risk vascular patients. Clinical trial registration: Clinical Trial registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov.Unique identifier: NCT00153101.

Volume 39
Pages 766 - 774
DOI 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002697
Language English
Journal Journal of Hypertension

Full Text