Systematic Review on Therapeutic Strategies to Minimize Corneal Stromal Scarring After Injury.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate recent studies on available and experimental therapies in preventing or minimizing corneal stromal scarring after injury.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe performed an Entrez PubMed literature search using keywords cornea, scarring, haze, opacity, ulcer, treatments, therapies, treatment complications, and pathophysiology resulting in 390 articles of which 12 were analyzed after filtering, based on English language and publication within 8 years, and curation for relevance by the authors.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe 12 articles selected included four randomized control trials (RCTs) (two were double-blinded placebo-controlled RCTs, one was a prospective partially masked RCT, and one was an open-label RCT), two retrospective observational studies, and six laboratory-based studies including two studies having in vivo and in vitro experiments, one was in vivo study, one was ex vivo study, and the last two were in vitro studies. The current mainstay for preventing or minimizing corneal scarring involves the use of topical corticosteroids and local application of mitomycin C. However, supportive evidence for their use in clinical practice from well-designed RCTs is lacking. Laboratory studies on topical rosiglitazone therapy, vitamin C prophylaxis, gene therapy, and stem cell therapy have shown promising results but have yet to be translated to clinical research.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThere is a need for more robust randomized controlled trials to support treatments using topical corticosteroids and mitomycin C. Furthermore, their clinical efficacy and safety profile should be compared with new treatments that have shown promising results in the laboratory setting. Ultimately, the goal should be to personalize cornea scarring treatment according to the most effective treatment for the specific underlying pathology.