Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners | 2019

Hypertonic saline versus mannitol for the treatment of increased intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury.

 
 

Abstract


BACKGROUND\nIncreased intracranial pressure (ICP) occurring after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. If appropriate treatments are not initiated, brain herniation can occur and lead to death. Previously, the Brain Trauma Foundation recommended mannitol as the first-choice hyperosmolar agent. However, in 2016, they retracted this recommendation, citing a lack of sufficient supporting evidence. Current research shows that hypertonic saline (HTS) also decreases ICP.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nTo compare the efficacy of HTS and mannitol in lowering ICP in patients with TBI.\n\n\nDATA SOURCES\nA search was conducted up to June 1, 2019, using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Selected articles compared mannitol and HTS in adults with TBI, with the measured outcome of reduced ICP. Four meta-analyses, three randomized controlled trials, and one retrospective cohort study met the inclusion criteria.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nHypertonic saline is an effective alternative to mannitol for increased ICP. Three studies suggested HTS may be superior to mannitol. Conclusions were limited by sample size and methodological differences, such as varying concentrations and doses, and inclusion of patients without TBI in their studies.\n\n\nIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\nEvidence demonstrates HTS to be as effective as mannitol for ICP reduction. Further research in a large multicenter clinical trial is needed to compare these two agents for superiority in the management of increased ICP. Providers should consider the properties of each agent, adverse effects, and potential benefits when selecting a hyperosmotic agent.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000340
Language English
Journal Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

Full Text