Lung Navigation Ventilation Protocol to Optimize Biopsy of Peripheral Lung Lesions.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nComputed tomography-to-body divergence caused by respiratory motion, atelectasis, diaphragmatic motion and other factors is an obstacle to peripheral lung biopsies. We examined a conventional ventilation strategy versus a lung navigation ventilation protocol (LNVP) optimized for intraprocedural 3-dimensional image acquisition and bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung nodules.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective, single center study was conducted in consecutive subjects with peripheral lung lesions measuring <30\u2009mm. Effects of ventilation strategies including atelectasis and tool-in-lesion confirmation were assessed using cone beam computed tomography images. Diagnostic yield was also evaluated. Complications were assessed through 7 days.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifty subjects were included (25 per group) with 27 nodules in the conventional group and 25 nodules in the LNVP group. Atelectasis was assessed by 2 blinded readers: [reader 1 (R1) and reader 2 (R2)]. Atelectasis was more prevalent in the conventional ventilation group, both for dependent atelectasis (R1: 64% and R2: 68% vs. R1: 36% and R2: 16%, P=0.00014) and sublobar/lobar atelectasis (R1: 48% and R2: 56% vs. R1: 20% and R2: 32%, P=0.01). Similarly, the target lesion was obscured due to atelectasis more often in the conventional ventilation group (R1: 36% and R2: 36% vs. R1: 4% and R2: 8%, P=0.01). Diagnostic yield was 70% for conventional ventilation and 92% for LNVP (P=0.08).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nLNVP demonstrated markedly reduced dependent and sublobar/lobar atelectasis and lesions either partially or completely obscured by atelectasis compared with conventional ventilation. Future prospective studies are necessary to understand the impact of protocolized ventilation strategies for bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung lesions.