Medicine | 2021

Radiation dose levels in chest computed tomography scans of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Abstract To investigate computed tomography (CT) diagnostic reference levels for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia by collecting radiation exposure parameters of the most performed chest CT examinations and emphasize the necessity of low-dose CT in COVID-19 and its significance in radioprotection. The survey collected RIS data from 2119 chest CT examinations for 550 COVID-19 patients performed in 92 hospitals from January 23, 2020 to May 1, 2020. Dose data such as volume computed tomography dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose (ED) were recorded and analyzed. The radiation dose levels in different hospitals have been compared, and average ED and cumulative ED have been studied. The median dose-length product, volume computed tomography dose index, and ED measurements were 325.2\u200amGy\u200acm with a range of 6.79 to 1098\u200amGy\u200acm, 9.68\u200amGy with a range of 0.62 to 33.80\u200amGy, and 4.55\u200amSv with a range of 0.11 to 15.37\u200amSv for COVID-19 CT scanning protocols in Chongqing, China. The distribution of all observed EDs of radiation received by per patient undergoing CT protocols during hospitalization yielded a median cumulative ED of 17.34\u200amSv (range, 2.05–53.39\u200amSv) in the detection and management of COVID-19 patients. The average number of CT scan times for each patient was 4.0\u200a±\u200a2.0, and the average time interval between 2 CT scans was 7.0\u200a±\u200a5.0\u200adays. The average cumulative ED of chest CT examinations for COVID-19 patients in Chongqing, China greatly exceeded public limit and the annual dose limit of occupational exposure in a short period. For patients with known or suspected COVID-19, a chest CT should be performed on the principle of rapid-scan, low-dose, single-phase protocol instead of routine chest CT protocol to minimize radiation doses and motion artifacts.

Volume 100
Pages None
DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000026692
Language English
Journal Medicine

Full Text