The value of intravenous contrast medium in PSMA PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the added value of diagnostic abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). Methods Eighty-two consecutive patients (median age, 69 years; range, 45–86 years) with BCR underwent Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT with low-dose nonenhanced (ne) whole-body CT and diagnostic ceCT. Imaging results were retrospectively reviewed by two readers (R1, R2) for diagnostic certainty, local recurrence, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and bone metastasis. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Histopathology served as reference standard in 7, imaging and clinical follow-up in 65 and clinical follow-up alone in 10 patients. Results Certain local recurrence, LNM and bone metastasis diagnoses increased substantially from ceCT (R1: 5%/18%/32%; R2: 37%/50%/82%) to nePET/CT (R1: 78%/87%/93%; R2: 81%/87%/95%) for both readers, but the difference between nePET/CT and cePET/CT (R1: 77%/96%/92%; R2: 89%/94%/96%) was marginal. Interobserver agreement was minimal with ceCT (Krippendorff’s alpha: 0.04–0.26), substantial with nePET/CT (0.60–0.86) and best with cePET/CT (0.76–0.86). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for local recurrence for R1/R2 were 0.60/0.65 for ceCT, 0.81/0.79 for nePET/CT and 0.81/0.82 for cePET/CT. AUCs for LNMs for R1/R2 were 0.67/0.77 for ceCT, 0.91/0.82 for nePET/CT and 0.92/0.87 for cePET/CT. AUCs for BMs for R1/R2 were 0.60/0.53 for ceCT, 0.93/0.84 for nePET/CT and 0.93/0.86 for cePET/CT. Conclusion Diagnostic abdominal ceCT increases the diagnostic certainty and interobserver agreement in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in BCR of prostate cancer. The diagnostic performance of cePET/CT is significantly better than ceCT alone but not nePET/CT.