Nuclear medicine communications | 2021

Quantitative analysis in parathyroid adenoma scintigraphy.

 
 
 
 

Abstract


OBJECTIVE\nSurgery is the only curative treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. Parathyroid scintigraphy is one method used to preoperatively localize the lesion. We examined time-related changes in radiopharmaceutical uptake in parathyroid adenomas (PTAs) and thyroid gland by quantitative single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging to assess differences between rapid and delayed washout patterns.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nThe study group consisted of 35 histologically verified PTAs after radio-guided surgery extirpation in 33 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Patients underwent a three-phase SPECT/CT study of the neck and upper thorax post 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) injection. Images were reconstructed using a proprietary ordered-subset-conjugate-gradient-maximization algorithm (Siemens xSPECT Quant). PTAs were divided into those with a rapid (group A) and those with a slow (group B) washout pattern. SUVmax values of PTAs and thyroid gland tissue at 10, 90 and 180\u2009min post 99mTc-MIBI injection were recorded and statistically assessed. Retention indexes related to the early examination were calculated for PTA and thyroid gland (RI-PTA and RI-TG).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 11 PTAs in group A and 24 in group B. Significant between-group differences in PTA SUVmax and PTA/thyroid gland ratios were observed only at 180\u2009min postinjection (P\u2009=\u20090.0297, P\u2009=\u20090.0222, respectively). RI-PTAs differed significantly at 90 and 180\u2009min postinjection (P\u2009=\u20090.0298, P\u2009=\u20090.0431). No differences in PTA volumes, thyroid gland SUVmax values or RI-TG were observed between the groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPTAs with rapid and slow washout patterns have different characteristics on quantitative analysis in later phases. No significant differences in directly measurable quantitative values (SUVmax, PTA/thyroid gland ratio) at the early stages of multi-phase examination were observed.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001474
Language English
Journal Nuclear medicine communications

Full Text