Extending the Reach of Craniofacial Free Flaps Using the Descending Branch of the Lateral Circumflex Femoral Vessels

Abstract

Summary: Craniofacial free tissue transfer is sometimes complicated by insufficient pedicle length and/or paucity of recipient vessels. A saphenous vein graft can be used to reach the high-flow, large-caliber vessels of the neck, but because of the vein’s taper and thick wall, there is often a mismatch. Following the principle of like-for-like, the authors prefer the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels to achieve a more anatomical pedicle extension for free tissue transfer in complex craniofacial reconstruction. The authors’ experience using the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle extender from 2010 to 2019 was reviewed. Indications, patient characteristics, reconstruction site, flap type, pedicle length, recipient vessels, and vascular complications were noted. The authors reviewed two strategies for implementation of the pedicle extender: in some cases, the flap was first transferred and allowed to perfuse on the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels in the thigh, and then transferred to the recipient vessels (double-ischemia transfer); and in other cases, the flap and pedicle extender were transferred such that the flap underwent a single period of ischemia (single-ischemia transfer). The descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle extender was used in 17 craniofacial cases. Indications included tumor, trauma, osteoradionecrosis, and congenital. Double-ischemia transfer was used in eight cases and single-ischemia transfer in nine. The longest pedicle extender in the series was 15 cm. Arterial thrombosis occurred in one case. This case series demonstrates that the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle extender is a viable option for complex craniofacial free tissue transfer cases. It provides ample length and excellent vessel match, following the like-for-like principle. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.