A Volumetric and Morphological Analysis of Recurrent Odontogenic Keratocysts by Semiautomatic Segmentation.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nThe authors conducted this study to provide morphological and volumetric data of recurrent odontogenic keratocysts of the upper and lower jaw to emphasize risk factors in accordance with their radiological appearance and guide clinical decisions for jeopardized patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nBy applying the open-source software ITK-Snap on cone-beam computed tomography images, volumetric measurements of histopathologically diagnosed recurrent odontogenic keratocysts could be performed. For statistical investigations, descriptive statistics and independent Student t test were performed. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess intra- and inter-rater reliabilities. P values P\u200a<\u200a0.05 were considered significant.\n\n\nRESULTS\nForty patients (24 male and 16 female) were included in this study. Recurrent odontogenic keratocysts had a mean maximum diameter of 28.91\u200amm\u200a±\u200a12.00\u200amm and a mean volume of 4.48\u200acm3\u200a±\u200a4.29\u200acm3. According to morphology, irregular shape (P\u200a=\u200a0.001; P\u200a=\u200a0.005), unclear margin (P\u200a=\u200a0.001; P\u200a=\u200a0.001), multilocular morphology (P\u200a=\u200a0.001; P\u200a=\u200a0.001), and cortical bone exceedance (P\u200a=\u200a0.001; P\u200a=\u200a0.007) are statistically significantly associated with a larger cyst diameter and volume. Furthermore, significant differences by diameter and volume could be shown between patients with and without iliac crest graft reconstruction (P\u200a=\u200a0.001; P\u200a=\u200a0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nVolumetric analysis reveals that recurrent odontogenic keratocysts show large diametric and volumetric extension that leads to complex reconstruction by iliac crest grafts, adding an argument that special attention should be paid to this entity and its recurrence. In case of difficult histopathological examination, lesions with irregular shape and margin, multilocular morphology, cortical bone exceedance, and clinically visible symptoms should be considered for close morphological and volumetric clinico-radiological follow-up.