Challenges in Anesthesia Management for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Retrospective Analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is used to treat achalasia with efficacy and reliability. However, during the procedure potential complications require attention in terms of anesthesia. This study aimed to investigate complications of the POEM procedure and its effects on arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters, peak airway pressures (PIP), hemodynamics, and postoperative analgesia requirements.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData from 220 patients who underwent POEM between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively assessed. During the procedure, ABG samples, PIP, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were recorded. The effects of the procedure and paracentesis on ABG, PIP, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, perioperative complications, and postoperative analgesia requirements were assessed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nData from 220 POEM patients were analyzed. During the procedure, the mean PaCO2 was 48.27±6.34\u2009mm\u2009Hg, which was significantly higher than the PaCO2 values before and after the procedure. The mean increase in maximum PIP was 5.90±3.49\u2009cmH2O during the procedure. However, there was a significant decrease in PaCO2 and PIP values in cases with paracentesis compared with those without paracentesis. With regards to complications, subcutaneous emphysema (48, 21.8%), pneumoperitoneum requiring decompression (66, 30%), pneumothorax (1, 0.5%), aspiration pneumonia (1, 0.5%), and bronchospasm (5, 2.2%) were observed during the procedure. In the postoperative period, 58 patients (26%) had additional analgesia requirements because of visual analog scale values >3.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPeriprocedural abdominal decompression with veress needle led to a reduction in arterial PaCO2 and PIP, and improved postoperative analgesia. Serious complications because of perioperative aspiration and CO2 insufflation were observed during the POEM procedure.