Survey of Clinical Neurophysiology and Epilepsy Fellowship Programs in the United States During COVID-19.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nThe COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical practice, education, and research in Neurophysiology/Epilepsy. Although there is published literature on clinical impact, its educational impact is not well described. A national survey of Clinical Neurophysiology (CNP) and Epilepsy fellowship programs was conducted to assess the impact of COVID-19 on fellowship education.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA list of accredited Clinical Neurophysiology and Epilepsy fellowship programs was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Program directors at individual locations were contacted to complete a brief survey about the program and impact of COVID-19. Fellows from responding programs were subsequently invited to share their perceptions about the impact of the pandemic on their training.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFrom 176 programs, 40 PDs responded (22.7%). From these 40 programs, fellows from 26 completed surveys (65.0% response). There was a reduction in EEG and epilepsy monitoring unit volumes post-COVID-19, with a trend of change for EMG, whereas continuous EEG volumes were mostly unchanged. The impact of the pandemic on training was rated as moderate to severe (≥50%) by 30.0% of PDs and 49.0% of trainees. In remarkable agreement, 20.0% of PDs and 20.4% of fellows believed that additional fellowship training was needed before graduation. Lack of fellow satisfaction was correlated with the perceived impact of the pandemic on education (p = 0.008).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis survey revealed a considerable impact on EEG/EMG clinical volume because of COVID-19, although continuous EEG was not as impacted. More fellows than PDs believed that training was considerably impacted by COVID-19, but a similar number thought that additional training was needed. It was unclear from this study whether the fellows perception of educational impact was solely because of the pandemic or in addition to preexisting training deficiencies in the training programs.