Archive | 2021

Sterilization of disposable face masks with respect to COVID-19 shortages; a nationwide field study including 19 sterilisation departments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Objective Face masks also referred to as half masks are essential to protect healthcare professionals, working in close contact with patients having Covid 19 related symptoms. During the threating deficit, healthcare institutions sought an approach to reuse face masks or to acquire imported masks. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of sterilised and imported FFP2/KN95 face mask materials. Design: prospective, bench to bedside Setting: General healthcare including 19 hospitals in the Netherlands Interventions: Face masks were reprocessed using a medical autoclave at 121 0C. Methods A 48 minutes steam sterilization process of single-use face masks with 15 min holding time at a 121 0C was developed, validated and implemented in 19 different hospitals. Steam and H2O2 plasma sterilized as well as new, imported masks are tested in a custom-made, non-standard EN-149, test set-up that measures Particle Filtration Efficiency (PFE) and pressure drops. Results PFE validation data of 84 masks indicated differences of 2.3 +/- 2 % (mean +/- SD) between the custom build test set-up and a continues flow according to the EN-149. Test data showed the mean PFE values of 444 sterilised FFP2 face masks from 19 CSSD were 90 +/- 11% (mean +/- SD) and of 474 imported KN95/FFP2 face masks 83 / 16% (mean +/- SD). Differences in PFE between sterilisation departments were found. Conclusion Face masks can be reprocessed with 121 0C steam or H2O2 plasma sterilization with minimum reduction of PFE. PFE comparison between sterilised mask and new, imported mask filter material indicates that most reprocessed masks of high quality brands outperform new imported face masks of unknown brands. Although the PFE of tested face mask material from different sterilisation departments remained efficient, different types of sterilisation equipment can result in different PFE outcomes.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.15.21249843
Language English
Journal None

Full Text