Long-term cross-scale comparison of grazing and mowing on plant diversity and community composition in a salt-marsh system

Abstract

Land abandonment is increasing in recent decades in Europe, usually accompanied by a decline in biodiversity. Whether livestock grazing and mowing can safeguard biodiversity across spatial scales in the long term is unclear. Using a 48-year experiment in a salt marsh, we compared land abandonment (without grazing and mowing) and seven management regimes including cattle grazing, early season mowing, late season mowing, both early and late season mowing, and grazing plus each of the mowing regimes on plant diversity at the local (i.e. plot) and landscape scales (i.e. across plots). Also, we compared their effects on community composition (both in identities and abundances) in time and space. Under land abandonment, plant diversity declined in the local communities and this decline became more apparent at the landscape scale, particularly for graminoids and halophytes. All management regimes, except the late season mowing, maintained plant diversity at these scales. Local plant communities under all treatments underwent different successional trajectories, in the end, diverged from their initial state except for that under grazing (a cyclic succession). Interannual composition change remained stable over time under land abandonment and grazing plus early season mowing. It increased over time under grazing and late season mowing, it increased in the second half of the experiment under other treatments. Vegetation homogenized in the landscape over time under land abandonment while vegetation was heterogeneous under all management regimes. Synthesis. Our experiment suggests that late season mowing may not be sustainable to conserve plant diversity in salt marshes. Other management regimes can maintain plant diversity across scales and vegetation heterogeneity in the landscape in the long term, but local community composition may change over time.