Patient-centered care, advance care planning, and treatment preferences among home medical care patients in Japan: The ZEVIOUS study

Abstract

Abstract Background: It remains unclear how both the quality of patient-centered care and the patient s illness affect advance care planning (ACP) in primary care settings. Identifying the facilitators and barriers to ACP in primary care settings has become a growing scientific and clinical challenge. Objective: To examine the association between the quality of primary care and ACP preparedness among patients. Additionally, to investigate whether ACP preparedness and the patient s illness are associated with the expression of future treatment preferences. Design: Multicenter cross-sectional study. Participants: Adult Japanese patients receiving home medical care. Main Measures: A survey was run to assess consideration of ACP by patients and expression of future treatment preferences. The quality of primary care, which reflects patient centeredness, was assessed with the Japanese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Short Form. Information on the clinical conditions that required home medical care was collected from physicians. Key Results: Of 194 patients using 29 home medical services, 62 patients (32%) showed signs of ACP preparedness, and 153 patients (78%) expressed their treatment preferences. In a multivariable-adjusted generalized estimating equation, primary care quality was associated with ACP preparedness (per 10-point increase, adjusted OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.51-2.56). However, we found insufficient evidence to support that ACP preparedness was associated with a lower incidence of non-expression of treatment preferences (adjusted OR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.49-2.12). In contrast, having cancer was associated with a lower incidence of non-expression of treatment preferences (adjusted OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01-0.995). Conclusions: At a minimum, patient centeredness in home medical care facilitates must ensure the initiation of ACP preparedness. To understand the association between ACP preparedness and expression of treatment preferences, further efforts are warranted to clarify the quality and content of ACP preparedness simultaneously with the patient s illness.