bioRxiv | 2019

Synthetic lethality targeting LKB1 mutant and EGFR wild type human non-small cell lung cancer cells by glucose starvation and SGLT2 inhibition

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


In this study, we aimed to discover novel therapeutic approaches targeting non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without EGFR mutation. First, we found that mutations of EGFR and LKB1 are mutually exclusive in NSCLC. EGFR-WT/LKB1-mutant cells are resistant to EGFR inhibitor erlotinib but are highly susceptible to glucose starvation or SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin. Mechanistically, in these cells, glucose starvation causes suppression of AMPK and induction of oxidative stress, leading to cell death. Finally, canagliflozin effectively reduces tumor growth of EGFR-WT/LKB1-mutant NSCLC cells in the mice xenograft model. Our data thus demonstrate that synthetic lethality can be achieved by glucose starvation or SGLT2 inhibition in EGFR-WT/LKB1-mutant NSCLC. SIGNIFICANCE At present, EGFR inhibitor-based targeted therapy can only benefit those non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop alternate targeted therapy for NSCLC with WT EGFR. In this study, we found that mutations of EGFR and LKB1 are mutually exclusive in NSCLC, and more importantly, synthetic lethality can be achieved in EGFR-WT/LKB1-mutant NSCLC cells with glucose starvation or SGLT2 inhibition. Since SGLT2 inhibitors such as canagliflozin are FDA-approved drugs for type II diabetes, our study thus points out a possibility of developing SGLT2 inhibitors as a targeted therapy for NSCLC patients with WT EGFR and mutant LKB1, which will benefit about 15-30% of NSCLC patients. HIGHLIGHTS EGFR and LKB1 mutations are mutually exclusive in NSCLC EGFR-WT/LKB1-mutant NSCLC cells are sensitive to cell death induced by glucose starvation and SGLT2 inhibition Glucose starvation suppresses AMPK activity in LKB1-mutant NSCLC cells SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin causes synthetic lethality in LKB1-mutant NSCLC cells

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1101/622126
Language English
Journal bioRxiv

Full Text