Rapid Prototyping Journal | 2019

Using statistically designed experiment to optimize vacuum-assisted post-processing of binder jetted specimens

 
 
 

Abstract


Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThis paper aims to propose a vacuum-assisted post-processing method for use in binder jetted technology. The method is based on six key technological parameters and uses standard, commercially available consumables to achieve improvement in tensile strength, as well as the microstructure and porosity of the infiltrated matrix. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nSix key technological parameters were systematically varied as factors on three levels, using design of experiment, i.e. definitive screening design. Surface response methodology was used to optimize the process and yield optimal tensile strength for the given range of input factors. Thus obtained, the optimized factor settings were used in a set of confirmation runs, where the result of optimization was experimentally confirmed. To confirm improvement in microstructure of the infiltrated matrix, SEM analysis was performed, while the reduction of porosity was analyzed using mercury porosimetry. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe obtained results indicate that, compared to its conventional counterpart, the proposed, optimized infiltration method yields improvement in tensile strength which is significant from both the statistical and engineering point of view, while reducing porosity by 3.5 times, using only standard consumables. Scanning electron microscopy examination of fractured specimens’ micrographs also revealed significant morphological differences between the conventional and proposed method of post-processing. This primarily reflects in higher surface area under hardened epoxy infiltrate, which contributes to increased load capacity of specimen cross-section. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nAt the present stage of development, the most important limitation of the proposed method is the overall size of models which can be accommodated in standard vacuum impregnation units. Although, in this study, the infiltration method did not prove statistically significant, further investigation is required with models of complex geometry, various sizes and mass arrangements, where infiltration would be more challenging and could possibly result in different findings. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nThe most important practical implication of this study is the experimentally verified result of optimization, which showed that tensile strength and matrix microstructure can be significantly improved, using just standard consumables. \n \n \n \n \nSocial implications \n \n \n \n \nImproved strength contributes to reduction of material consumption, which, in a longer run, can be beneficial for environment protection and sustainable development. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nBased on literature review, there have been no previous investigations which studied the tensile strength of infiltrated specimens through design of experiment, which involved specimen preheating temperature, level and duration of vacuum treatment of infiltrate mixture and infiltrated specimens and infiltration method.

Volume 25
Pages 653-663
DOI 10.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0177
Language English
Journal Rapid Prototyping Journal

Full Text