Australian occupational therapy journal | 2019

Accurate assessment of functional abilities in pre-schoolers for diagnostic and funding purposes: A comparison of the Vineland-3 and the PEDI-CAT.

 
 
 

Abstract


AIM\nAssessment of functional abilities is an essential component in the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children. Functional abilities, assessed using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adapted Test (PEDI-CAT), are used to determine eligibility for early intervention funded under the National Disability Insurance Scheme in Australia (NDIS). This study aims to compare the use of the PEDI-CAT with the Vineland-3, a comprehensive parent interview for the determination of support needs, diagnosis, and eligibility for funding.\n\n\nMETHOD\nSeventy-five preschool aged children referred for formal diagnosis were assessed with the Vineland-3, and subscale scores reviewed for clinical judgement. These children were also assessed on the PEDI-CAT speedy version and the results on the two tests compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe PEDI-CAT was less sensitive than the Vineland-3 to the functional difficulties being experienced in this population of preschool aged children. The Vineland-3 had floor effects on some scales and deficits masked by skills in other areas in the same domain, but standard subscale scores allowed skills and areas needing support to be defined. Overall 25% of children clinically in need of support were not identified on the Pedi-cat compared to only 4% using Vineland Domain scores and 3% using Vineland-3 subscale scores. The PEDI-CAT also identified significantly lower levels of support required with only 32% of children found to need very substantial support compared to 40% of children on the Vineland Domain scores, and 59% using subscale scores.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBased on the results of this study, the Vineland-3 comprehensive interview interpreted using subscale scores as well as domain scores is more sensitive than the PEDI-CAT in identifying young children in need of support as well as the areas and degree of support required.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1111/1440-1630.12619
Language English
Journal Australian occupational therapy journal

Full Text