Addiction theory matters—Why there is no dependence on caffeine or antidepressant medication

Abstract

With the development of the ICD‐11, the debate about classifying certain psychoactive substances such as antidepressant medication and caffeine as drugs of dependence is ignited again. We argue that any coherent theory of addiction needs to identify the neurobiological processes elicited by a potentially addictive substance and to clearly define the clinical symptoms associated with these processes, which can then be used to guide diagnosis. Tolerance development and withdrawal symptoms can occur with any pharmacologically active agent, and their presence is not a sufficient criterion for the clinical diagnosis of an addictive disorder. Drug craving, drug seeking, and drug consumption in spite of harmful consequences are further key criteria for the diagnosis of substance dependence. Even though these symptoms have been associated with dopamine release in the ventral striatum, ventral striatal dopamine release alone is not a sufficient criterion of the addictive property of a drug. For example, common reinforcers such as food and sex increase dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens, but unlike in addictive substances, their effect is regulated by reward predictability and habituation. We emphasize the importance to integrate neurobiological as well as behavioral and clinical effects of a substance to assess its addictive liability. We provide a number of widely discussed examples and a list of key criteria as a conceptual guideline for addiction research and clinical practice.