Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nTo assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nAn electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single-arm meta-analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta-regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw and systems.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTen studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta-analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, CI: 95% [0.83, 1.21], 1.33 mm, CI: 95% [0.98, 1.67], and 3.59°, CI: 95% [2.09, 5.09]. Meta-regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p=0.295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p =0.36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p =0.875, 0.632, 0.281) and five different systems (p =0.762, 0.342, 0.336).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAccuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient-centered outcomes and socio-economic benefits should be reported.