Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | 2019

Improved utilization of waist‐to‐height ratio in cardiometabolic risk counselling in children: Application of DMAIC strategy

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES\nWaist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) are superior surrogate markers of central obesity than body mass index. However, WC is not measured routinely in paediatric clinics. The objective of this study was to implement measurement of WC during routine assessment of children in an ambulatory outpatient clinic setting and subsequent dissemination of cardiometabolic risk counselling in children with central obesity (defined as WHtR ≥0.5).\n\n\nMETHOD\nProspective cohort of patients aged 6 to 20\xa0years. Study period was divided into three phases: baseline (3\xa0months), process improvement (2\xa0months), and implementation (6\xa0months). Define-Measure-Analyse-Improve-Control (DMAIC) strategy was applied. Measurement of WC was implemented as a component of the physical examination in patients. Outcome measures were (1) improvement in frequency of WC measurement and (2) utilization of WHtR in cardiometabolic risk counselling.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWaist circumference was not measured in any patient during baseline phase (n\xa0=\xa0551). During process improvement phase, of the total 347 patients, WC was measured in 35% vs target of 30%. In the implementation phase, WC was measured in 37% patients (365 out of 964). Of these 365 patients, 175 (48%) had elevated WHtR, and 73% of them (n\xa0=\xa0128) were counselled about their increased cardiometabolic risk.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nApplication of an evidence-based DMAIC protocol led to significant improvement in assessment for central obesity in an ambulatory clinic practice and appropriate counselling regarding cardiometabolic risk reduction in children and adolescents with central obesity over an 8-month period. Meticulous planning and execution, frequent reinforcement, and integrating feedback from the involved multi-disciplinary team were important factors in successful implementation of this quality improvement project.

Volume 25
Pages 300–305
DOI 10.1111/jep.13055
Language English
Journal Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Full Text