Incidence and Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Migration With or Without Loss of Efficacy: A Retrospective Review of 91 Consecutive Thoracic Lead Implants.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nLead migration after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implant is a commonly reported complication and the most common reason for revision surgery in cases of loss of efficacy. The primary aims of this study are to describe the incidence and degree of lead migration in the subacute postoperative period after SCS implant and to report potential risk factors for lead migration.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nWe performed a retrospective chart review of all patients at a single academic center who received an SCS implant from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Information on patient (age, sex, weight, and height) and operative factors (device manufacturer, epidural access level and method, and implantable pulse generator location) were extracted from medical records. Intraoperative imaging was compared to subacute follow-up imaging obtained less than 20\u2009days postimplant to measure lead migration distance. Regression models were fitted to determine associations between lead migration distance and potential clinical risk factors.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 91 cases (182 leads) were included in the study. Within 20\u2009days of implantation, 88.5% of leads had migrated (86.3% caudal and 2.2% cephalad). Mean migration distance for leads with caudal migration only was 12.34 ±\u200912.19\u2009mm based on antero-posterior radiographs and 16.95 ±\u200915.68\u2009mm on lateral radiographs. There was an association of greater caudal lead migration as patient body mass index increased (β-coefficient 0.07 [95% confidence interval 0.01-0.13], p\xa0=\u20090.031). Within the entire cohort, one patient (1.1%) required lead revision for loss of efficacy.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn the subacute postoperative period after SCS implant, the majority of SCS leads migrated caudally with an average of two lead contacts. Knowledge of this expected migration and risk factors can better inform implanting physicians intraoperatively when deciding final lead placement location. The finding of high likelihood of caudal lead migration in the subacute postoperative period brings the need for a well-designed prospective study to the forefront of our field. This will allow implanting providers to make well-informed decisions for intraoperative lead placement.