Neuromuscular blockade with atracurium for ophthalmic surgery in horses-Effects on surgical and anesthetic characteristics and recovery quality.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE\nTo study the surgical, anesthetic and recovery qualities of horses receiving either a neuromuscular blocking agent (atracurium) or intravenous lidocaine (treatment groups A and L, respectively).\n\n\nANIMALS STUDIED\nA total of thirty horses presented for ocular surgery were used in this study.\n\n\nPROCEDURE\nHorses were randomly assigned to receive either atracurium (group A) or a lidocaine constant rate infusion (group L). Surgical quality was graded on a scale from 1 (excellent)-5 (poor). While anesthetized, the heart rate, oxygen saturation and mean arterial blood pressure, and end-expiratory carbon dioxide and desflurane concentration were monitored and recorded every 5\xa0minutes. Recovery was scored on a scale from 10 (best)-115 (worst).\n\n\nRESULTS\nHorses in treatment group A needed significantly less desflurane then horses in treatment group L (p\xa0=\xa00.04). Horses in treatment group A had a significantly better surgery score of 1 (1-2) (median and range) then horses in treatment group L (2.5; 1-5) (p\xa0=\xa00.02). The quality of recovery was significantly better in horses in treatment group A compared with treatment group L, and horses needed significantly less time to reach the standing position.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAtracurium and lidocaine CRI are safe methods of anesthesia for equine patients undergoing ocular surgery. Horses receiving atracurium needed less desflurane and had better surgery and recovery scores than horses receiving a lidocaine constant rate infusion.