Journal of Virology | 2019

The Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) Stimulates Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Productive Infection, in Part Because the Infected Cell Protein 0 (ICP0) Promoter Is Cooperatively Transactivated by the GR and Krüppel-Like Transcription Factor 15

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


The ability of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) to periodically reactivate from latency results in virus transmission and recurrent disease. The incidence of reactivation from latency is increased by chronic or acute stress. Stress increases the levels of corticosteroids, which bind and activate the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Since GR activation is an immediate early response to stress, we tested whether the GR influences productive infection and the promoter that drives infected cell protein 0 (ICP0) expression. Pretreatment of cells with a GR-specific antagonist (CORT-108297) significantly reduced virus replication. Although the GR had little effect on ICP0 promoter activity alone, the Krüppel-like transcription factor 15 (KLF15) cooperated with the GR to stimulate promoter activity in transfected cells. In transfected or infected cells, the GR and KLF15 occupied ICP0 sequences important for transactivation. Collectively, these studies provide insight into how stress can directly stimulate productive infection and viral gene expression. ABSTRACT Following acute infection, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) establishes lifelong latency in neurons. Physical, emotional, and chemical stresses are linked to increasing the incidence of reactivation from latency, but the mechanism of action is not well understood. In general, stress increases corticosteroid levels, leading to activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a pioneer transcription factor. Consequently, we hypothesized that stress-mediated activation of the GR can stimulate productive infection and viral gene expression. New studies demonstrated that the GR-specific antagonist (CORT-108297) significantly reduced HSV-1 productive infection in mouse neuroblastoma cells (Neuro-2A). Additional studies demonstrated that the activated GR and Krüppel-like transcription factor 15 (KLF15) cooperatively transactivated the infected cell protein 0 (ICP0) promoter, a crucial viral regulatory protein. Interestingly, the synthetic corticosteroid dexamethasone and GR or KLF15 alone had little effect on ICP0 promoter activity in transfected Neuro-2A or Vero cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies revealed that the GR and KLF15 occupied ICP0 promoter sequences important for transactivation at 2 and 4\u2009h after infection; however, binding was not readily detected at 6\u2009h after infection. Similar results were obtained for cells transfected with the full-length ICP0 promoter. ICP0 promoter sequences lack a consensus “whole” GR response element (GRE) but contain putative half-GREs that were important for dexamethasone induced promoter activity. The activated GR stimulates expression of, and interacts with, KLF15; consequently, these data suggest KLF15 and the GR form a feed-forward loop that activates viral gene expression and productive infection following stressful stimuli. IMPORTANCE The ability of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) to periodically reactivate from latency results in virus transmission and recurrent disease. The incidence of reactivation from latency is increased by chronic or acute stress. Stress increases the levels of corticosteroids, which bind and activate the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Since GR activation is an immediate early response to stress, we tested whether the GR influences productive infection and the promoter that drives infected cell protein 0 (ICP0) expression. Pretreatment of cells with a GR-specific antagonist (CORT-108297) significantly reduced virus replication. Although the GR had little effect on ICP0 promoter activity alone, the Krüppel-like transcription factor 15 (KLF15) cooperated with the GR to stimulate promoter activity in transfected cells. In transfected or infected cells, the GR and KLF15 occupied ICP0 sequences important for transactivation. Collectively, these studies provide insight into how stress can directly stimulate productive infection and viral gene expression.

Volume 93
Pages None
DOI 10.1128/JVI.02063-18
Language English
Journal Journal of Virology

Full Text